Given a graph G=(V, E), an ( α,β) -ruling set is a subset S ⊆ V such that the distance between any two vertices in S is at least α, and the distance between any vertex in V and the closest vertex in S is at most β. We present lower bounds for distributedly computing ruling sets. More precisely, for the problem of computing a ( 2, β) - ruling set (and hence also any ( α,β) -ruling set with ) in the LOCAL model of distributed computing, we show the following, where n denotes the number of vertices, Δ the maximum degree, and c is some universal constant independent of n and Δ. · Any deterministic algorithm requires Ω(min{[(logΔ)/(β log log Δ)], logΔ n}) rounds, for all β ≤ c·min{√{[(log Δ)/(log log Δ)]}, logΔ n}. By optimizing Δ, this implies a deterministic lower bound of Ω(√{[log n/(β log log n)]}) for all β ≤ c3√{[log n/log log n]}. ·Any randomized algorithm requires Ω(min{[(log Δ)/(β log log Δ)], log log n}) rounds, for all β ≤ c·min{√{[(log Δ)/(log log Δ)]}, log log n}. By optimizing Δ, this implies a randomized lower bound of Ω(√{[log log n/(βlog log log n)]}) for all β ≤ c3√{[log log n/log log log n]}. For , this improves on the previously best lower bound of Ω(log*n) rounds that follows from the 30-year-old bounds of Linial [FOCS'87] and Naor [J.Disc.Math.'91] (resp. Ω(1) rounds if β ∈ ω(log*n)). For β = 1, i.e., for the problem of computing a maximal independent set (which is nothing else than a (2, 1)-ruling set), our results improve on the previously best lower bound of Ω(log*n) on trees, as our bounds already hold on trees.

Distributed Lower Bounds for Ruling Sets

Balliu, Alkida;Olivetti, Dennis
2020-01-01

Abstract

Given a graph G=(V, E), an ( α,β) -ruling set is a subset S ⊆ V such that the distance between any two vertices in S is at least α, and the distance between any vertex in V and the closest vertex in S is at most β. We present lower bounds for distributedly computing ruling sets. More precisely, for the problem of computing a ( 2, β) - ruling set (and hence also any ( α,β) -ruling set with ) in the LOCAL model of distributed computing, we show the following, where n denotes the number of vertices, Δ the maximum degree, and c is some universal constant independent of n and Δ. · Any deterministic algorithm requires Ω(min{[(logΔ)/(β log log Δ)], logΔ n}) rounds, for all β ≤ c·min{√{[(log Δ)/(log log Δ)]}, logΔ n}. By optimizing Δ, this implies a deterministic lower bound of Ω(√{[log n/(β log log n)]}) for all β ≤ c3√{[log n/log log n]}. ·Any randomized algorithm requires Ω(min{[(log Δ)/(β log log Δ)], log log n}) rounds, for all β ≤ c·min{√{[(log Δ)/(log log Δ)]}, log log n}. By optimizing Δ, this implies a randomized lower bound of Ω(√{[log log n/(βlog log log n)]}) for all β ≤ c3√{[log log n/log log log n]}. For , this improves on the previously best lower bound of Ω(log*n) rounds that follows from the 30-year-old bounds of Linial [FOCS'87] and Naor [J.Disc.Math.'91] (resp. Ω(1) rounds if β ∈ ω(log*n)). For β = 1, i.e., for the problem of computing a maximal independent set (which is nothing else than a (2, 1)-ruling set), our results improve on the previously best lower bound of Ω(log*n) on trees, as our bounds already hold on trees.
2020
978-1-7281-9621-3
Ruling set; maximal independent set; distributed graph algorithms; lower bounds.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020_61stFOCS_365_Balliu.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 227 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
227 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
PostPrint_2020_61stFOCS_365_Balliu.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 352.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
352.14 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12571/24946
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact